I honestly had my doubts when I first read the title of this reading; it seemed far-fetched to think that the way we all design could be reduced in an outline that speaks to us all…and I stand corrected.
I liked this reading, and I liked it because it was easy to agree with, even for those who do not always follow these steps religiously. The outline makes perfect sense. First, start out with a concept which CANNOT be a description and proceed to elaborate the justification behind this concept by providing synthesized analysis. A good point. It took me at least three semesters to finally realize that site analysis with no synthesis is just a bunch of CAD elevation drawing; they may look cool but don’t do much on their own.
There has always been issue of where the derivation of form comes from and at what point of the project is it justifiable to “know” the form of the project. It has always been hard for me to understand a project that is “form driven” since that does not necessarily conform into a suitable concept for the project as a whole, which is why I found it interesting that in this reading the form was not to implied from any type of idea configured near the concept stage.
Once the concept is decided, it is time to add the structure and give the project some hierarchy. Yes, true, making sure to not deviate from the original intent while also trying to not get too overwhelmed by the enormous scope of issues you will undoubtedly have to address (or try to!). One step at a time, and if your concept is good, then ideas, values, and objectives will fall neatly in their place of importance. Then it comes time to start understanding the experience of the project, which is successfully achieved by the making of models and by applying materials to what was vague before.
It really is funny to have the process of project-making summarized in front of me like this, to simplify a process that took me four years to understand and decipher. It is nice to know that I have enough experience now to be able to relate to the different steps in the process, and a good check to make sure that I will always be somewhat on the right track.
Bring on the thesis!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Nells,
ReplyDeleteI think you bring up an interesting point about where in the process 'form' comes into place. It seems to be a topic Mateo somewhat dances around for the most part, but he does say (in step 1b) that the less ideas 'imply a specific form the more useful they are.' I wish he had expanded on this point, but I suppose, we can imply that he believes form comes in a later part of the process. Personally, I believe the development of form permeates throughout each step of the process, and it varies from project to project.